Like
the Pallava king Mahendravarman, who was converted by Appar, the older
contemporary of Tirujnanasam-bandar, Arikesari Parankusa, the Pandyan king, was
re-claimed from Jainism by the saint, Tirujnanasam-bandar, in the latter half
of the seventh century A. D. This king with the zeal of a new convert and with
the enthusiastic support of his queen advanced his faith.
During
the time of Simhavishnu, who overcame the Pandyas, his son Mahendravarman and
grandson Narasimhavarman, who dominated in the South during his time, as the
vanquisher of even Pulakesin of the Western Chalukya dynasty, Pallava influence
was dominant in the South. The Pandya king Maravarman Rajasimha, also known as
Pallavabhanjana, found it a favourable moment to attack the Pallavas during the
time of Nandivarman Pallavamalla. His son Nedunjadayan had a minister
uttarantantri Marangari alias Madhurakavi, who excavated a temple for Vishnu in
the Annamalai hill in the neighbor-hood of Madurai and recorded it in an
inscription. It is this history of the early Pandyas which should help us
under-stand why both the cave temples and the rock-cut free standing temples of
the Pandyas so closely resemble and recall those of the early Pallavas.
The
Pandyas, like the Chalukyas, were frequently fighting the Pallavas, but
nevertheless were struck with the beauty of the Pallava cave temples and
monolithic shrines.
They
had also a matrimonial alliance with the Pallavas as in the case of Kochchadayan,
the father of Maravarman Rajasimha, and the aesthetic taste of a princess of
the Pallava line would not have gone without self-expression, specially when we
remember that Rangapataka, the queen of Pallava Rajasimha, associated herself
with her husband in the construction of lovely temples at Kanchipuram, and this
artistic taste was inborn in their family. It is no wonder therefore that,
considering the proximity of the Pallava country, with the Chera power
practically eclipsed at the time, the Pandyas adopted the ideas of the Pallavas
in architecture, sculpture and painting.
In the
Tirumalaipuram cave temple, there are fragments discovered by Professor Jouveau
Dubreuil to show specimens of the painter's art in the early Pandyan period.
The cave closely resembles the Pallava caves of Mahendravarman. Though most of
the paintings here are obliterated, the few that remain show the dexterity of
the painter in portraying such themes as the swan or the duck and lotuses in
bud and bloom in pleasing patterns covering the ceiling and on the pillar
brackets.
There
are also themes like hunters and their wives, one of whom is shown carrying a
wild boar after a hunt. This theme of bacchanalian orgies suggests traces of
foreign influence, which is explained by the fact that the Pandyan kingdom was
a rich commercial centre, with contacts all over the civilised world, specially
with Rome, from the early centuries of the Christian era. The pearls of the
Pandyan fisheries were greatly in demand in Rome and a regular colony of
Yavanas existed at Madurai.
To
Professor Jouveau Dubreuil, we owe the discovery of paintings similar to those
at Ajanta in Sittannavasal. These are in the best tradition of classical art
and were originally believed to be Pallava. It is now found that there are two
layers of paintings, an earlier one and a later one, as also an inscription which
proves that what were originally reckoned Pallava are really Pandyan paintings
of the ninth century A.D.
The
ceiling of the cave contains a picture of a magnificent lake with beautiful
buffaloes, geese and fish frolicking amidst lotuses in bud and bloom, in the
gathering of which some youths are shown engaged. The figures are drawn with
great care and delicacy of feeling. The most magnificent of the paintings,
however, are the king wearing a lovely crown and accompanied by his queen, with
an umbrella raised over both, and two female dancers of exquisite grace and
proportions, all presented on the cubical parts of the pillars of the mandapa.
Much of this has been ruined by weather and vandalism. There is still enough
left to help us judge the skill of the painter during the early phase of
Pandyan rule. The coiffure of the dancers, the lines composing the face, the
contour of the body in beautiful flexions, the attitude of the hands in
rhythmic dance motion is the work of a great master. The grace of the crown
with minute details of workmanship and the dignity of the royal figure in the
company of his consort cannot be praised too highly.
Writer – C. Shivaramamurti
The aim
of the Hindu being to break this chain of birth and rebirth that binds him to
the earth, the first step to be taken on this path is for each one to perform
well his own dharma or righteous duties. Hinduism is unique because it
differentiates between the duties of man and man, as also between the duties to
be followed at various stages of one's life. Lord Rama's dharma as an exile for
14 years was different to his later dharma as a ruler. The teacher, the nurse,
the priest, a mother or father each has to follow his or her own dharma.
Duties, whatever they are, have to be performed with excellence and moral
purity as the goal.
The
concept of Dharma is fundamental to Hinduism, as it is believed that it is only
through the pursuit of Dharma that there is social harmony and peace in the
world. The pursuit of Adharma (a path that rejects righteousness) leads to
conflicts, discord and imbalance.
The
saying, Dharanat Dharmah' means Dharma sustains the world and it is that which
holds the world together. It is duty performed with righteousness, with
discipline and moral and spiritual excellence. Varnashrama Dharma is
fundamental to Hindu belief and includes the duties of the various occupations,
orders and classes (Varna) and the duties in the four stages (ashramas) of
one's life. It enjoins that each person's dharma or duty depends on his
occupation, position, moral and spiritual development, age and marital status.
The Caste System
Although
the caste system has now been legally abolished, it is interesting to know its
origin. The original meaning of the word `varna' was order or class of people.
When the Indo-Aryans invaded the country, they came across the local
inhabitants whom they called Dasas or Dasyus. Instead of destroying them after
conquest, as has happened in other civilizations, they absorbed them by giving
them a lower but definite place in their society.
In time
this system came to be four-tiered, with four classes, the Brahmanas or
Brahmins (not to be confused with the Brahman) who were the teachers and
priests, the Kshatriyas or warriors and rulers, the Vaishyas, those who
followed commercial occupations, and the Sudras who performed manual labour and
were also farmers and agriculturists. The word 'varna' therefore implied the
social order and not caste, as even Manu has given the difference between Varna
(class or order) and jati (sect of birth or caste). A man's Varna depended as
much on his mental and physical equipment as on heritage. Therefore it was a
fluid state. A Brahmin for example, was one who evolved with the guna or
qualities and performed the karma, or action, enjoined on a Brahmin. (It was
only later that the word `varna' came to mean colour.)
The
jails (or sects) in time became more important than the four main classes. These
were mainly occupational (like the goldsmith jail, the weaver jati, the
carpenter jail etc.) and served the purpose of guilds which protected the
interests of their members, trained the young and saw to it that no outsider
entered the fold. In time these jails or sects grouped themselves under the
main classes which is why we speak today of four castes. However, it is not the
caste of a man but his sect that is important to this day. Even today these
sects often do not permit fluidity of movement, even where the old occupations
have broken down and new ones have come in.
The
untouchables or outcastes were originally those who had broken certain caste
rules. For example, the Nayadis, who were considered outcastes of the lowest
order, were originally Brahmins who were excommunicated for some reason. Also
later the Hindus, who were originally meat-eaters, slowly changed their eating
habits to vegetarianism, especially the Brahmins and Vaishyas who were
influenced by early Buddhism and Jainism. With this change, those who ate beef
or the meat of certain proscribed animals came to be considered outcastes or
untouchables, as, by this time, the cow had come to be regarded akin to a
mother, the people, being largely rural, having to depend on the cow's products
for sustenance. (This is why the cow is given the reverence due to a mother in
Hindu society to this day.)
However
there is no religious sanction whatsoever in Hinduism to the concept of
untouchability although later additions on the subject were inserted into the
earlier scriptures to justify its existence. It was a purely social practice
introduced by the upper castes to provide themselves with menial labour to
perform certain tasks repulsive to themselves such as those of cemetery
keepers, scavengers and cleaners. Hindu society has much to answer for this
inhuman treatment of a whole section of its own people, but the Hindu religion
had nothing to do with it.
These
four classes were not as rigid in ancient times as they became later. In the
Upanishads is the story of Satyakama, neither son of a servant maid, Jabala,
who did not know his gotra or clan of origin as even his mother did not know
who his father was nor his caste. He went to a great teacher known for his
wisdom that took young Brahmin boys as disciples, and told him the truth of his
parentage. He gave his name as Satyakama Jabala, after his mother. The Guru,
impressed with the truthfulness of the young man, initiated him as a
Brahmachari or student under him. He then gave him 400 head of cattle and asked
him to take them to the forest and to return only when these became a thousand
in number.
While
living in the forest alone for years, Satyakama learnt of the Brahman, the
Absolute, from communing with Nature, from the clouds in the skies, from the
music of the birds, from the trees and the flowers and from the beauty of all
Creation around and about him.
After
he had 1000 head of cattle he returned. When his Guru gazed at the brilliant, shining
face of his pupil, he knew that the young man had realised the Brahman and had
only to complete this knowledge by study with his teacher. Although only
Brahmins were initiated into higher religious education not birth alone but
aptitude also permitted the upward movement of the castes in Upanishadic times,
as seen by the beautiful story of Satyakama Jabala.
The
great Brahmin Rishi, Vyasa, was born when Parashara, the grandson of the Rishi
Vasishta, fell in love with a beautiful dark-skinned woman of the fisher tribe,
later named Satyavati. The child born to them was named Krishna Dvaipayana,
after his dark colour (krishna) taken after his mother, and the island (dvipa)
on which he was born. Only later did he become known as Veda Vyasa. Yet his
knowledge of the Vedas determined his caste as a Brahmin Rishi and not his
birth to a fisherwoman of a low caste.
Vyasa is often worshipped as divinity in human form, so great is the regard given to him by Hindus through the ages. His birth to a tribal fisherwoman was not looked down upon, nor did it affect his position as a Brahmin sage of the highest caste.
Vyasa is often worshipped as divinity in human form, so great is the regard given to him by Hindus through the ages. His birth to a tribal fisherwoman was not looked down upon, nor did it affect his position as a Brahmin sage of the highest caste.
(Similarly
Valmiki, the author of the epic, the Ramayana, was a hunter of the lowest caste
who came to be considered a Brahmin Rishi by virtue of his erudition.)
Satyavati subsequently married Santanu, King of Hastinapura. Her son
Vichitravirya could not bear any children and her step-son, Bhishma, would not
do so in view of a promise given to his late father not to marry or bear
children, so that Satyavati's progeny would rule the kingdom.
According
to the Niyoga custom of the times, on the death of a childless man or even if
he were alive but could not father children, his brother could father children
on his behalf. When it was found that her sons could not bear children, the
great queen, Satyavati, called on the son born to her through Sage Parashara,
the Sage Vyasa, and asked him to father children by her two daughters-in-law,
which he did. A servant woman of the palace approached Vyasa in a spirit of
great devotion and to her was born Vidura considered again one of the greatest
of Brahmin sages (in view of his wisdom and knowledge of the Dharma Shastras)
in spite of his mother being a servant woman of the lowest caste.
It was
from the sons of Vyasa that the Pandavas and the Kauravas were descended. Their
great-grandmother, Satyavati, belonged to a fisher tribe and their great-grandfather,
Parashara, was a Brahmin sage. Yet because they were princes of the royal house
of Hastinapura, they were considered Kshatriyas. In actual fact they were not
so by birth, only by occupation, once again proving that caste was purely
occupational.
Utanga,
a childhood Brahmin friend of Krishna, took a boon from him that, in his
wanderings, Krishna would provide him with water whenever he needed it. Once,
when he felt very thirsty, he thought of the Lord and suddenly a Nishada (an
outcaste hunter) appeared before him clothed in filthy rags, and offered water
from his animal-skin water-bag. Utanga refused it and berated Krishna in his
mind, as he felt he had not kept to his promise.
The Nishada tried to persuade Utanga again and again to drink the water but Utanga was adamant. The hunter then disappeared and the Lord appeared before Utanga and told him that he had sent Indra, King of the Devas, as a hunter with amrita, the nectar of immortality. Since Utanga had not shown any wisdom but had continued to differentiate between man and man based on externals such as caste, he had missed the rare chance of attaining immortality. The moral of this story is obvious.
The Nishada tried to persuade Utanga again and again to drink the water but Utanga was adamant. The hunter then disappeared and the Lord appeared before Utanga and told him that he had sent Indra, King of the Devas, as a hunter with amrita, the nectar of immortality. Since Utanga had not shown any wisdom but had continued to differentiate between man and man based on externals such as caste, he had missed the rare chance of attaining immortality. The moral of this story is obvious.
The
disciples of the great philosopher, Adi Shankara, once asked a Chandala (an
outcaste), to move away from his path. "Who are you and who am I? Is the
Self within me different from yours?" queried the Chandala (believed to be
Shiva in disguise). Shankara, realising the wisdom of these words, prostrated
before the Chandala saying, "One who is established in the Brahman, be he
a low-born Chandala or a twice-born Brahmin, verily I declare him my
Guru".
As late
as in the 8th century, an untouchable could be considered a Guru by
one born a brahmin like Adi Shankara.
Writer – Shakunthala Jagannathan
A MARKET SCENE AT KAND-E-BADAM, WEIGHING AND TRANSPORT OF ALMONDS
Artist, Sur Das
Babur
describes Farghana, its principal towns, villages and rivers in Section I of
the Babur Nama. Andijan was its capital, and Khujand one of its ancient
towns. He thus describes Kand-e-Badam which was known for its almonds:
"Kand:e-Badam
(village of almonds) is a dependency of Khujand ; though it is not a township
(qasbii) it is rather a good approach to one (ciasbcacha). Its almonds are
excellent, hence its name; they all go to Hormuz or to Hindustan. It is five or
six yighach east of Khu-jand."
This
painting is by Sur Das. In the background is Kand-e-Badam. In between the domes
of mosques are date-palms, reminding us of an Indian town. On the left a man is
plucking almonds and in the centre almonds are being weighed and bagged. In the
foreground they are being loaded on camels and transported to their
destination. There is action and movement in this painting which vividly
depicts trade in almonds, and how they were brought to India from Central Asia.
BABUR MEETING KHANZADA BEGAM, MEHR BANU. BEGAM AND OTHER LADIES
Artist, Mansur
Khanzada
Begam was the sister of Ba.bur. When he was forced to evacuate Samarkand in
1500 A.D. he was compelled to marry her to Shaibani Khan, his enemy. Shaibani
Khan was defeated by Shah Ismail of Persia, who killed him and made a drinking
cup of his skull. Babur thus describes his reunion with his sister:
"Khanzada
Begam was in Mery when Shah Ismail (Safavi) defeated the Auzbegs near that town
(916 A.H. =1510 A.D.); for my sake he treated her well, giving her sufficient
escort to Qunduz where she rejoined me. We had been apart for some ten years;
when Muhammadi Kukultash and I went to see her, neither she nor those about her
knew us, although I spoke. They recognized us after a time."
This
painting is by Mansur, who distinguished himself in painting birds and animals.
Here he depicts the reunion of brother and sister at Qunduz in Afghanistan.
Seated close to Babur is his companion Kukultash. Seated in front of Babur is
Khanzada Begam attended by maid-servants. Outside the kanat are soldiers armed
with spears, bows and arrows guarding the tent. There is no display of emotions
as the sister did not recognize her brother.
BABUR IN CHAR-BAGH AT ANDI JAN
Babur's
father Urnar Shaikh Mirza died at the fort of Akhsi while tending his pigeons.
As Babur describes, "the fort of Akhsi is situated above a deep ravine,
along this ravine stand the palace buildings, and from it on Monday, Ramzan 4,
Umar Shaikh Mirzd flew, with his pigeons and their house, and became a
falcon."
"At
the time of Umar Shaikh Mirza's accident, I was in the Four Gardens
(Char-biigh) of Andijan. The news reached Andijan on Tuesday, Ramzan 5 (June
9th); I mounted at once, with my followers and retainers, intending to go into
the fort but, on our getting near the Mirza's Gate, Shirim Taghai took hold of
my bridle and moved off towards the Praying Place. It had crossed his mind that
if a great ruler like Si. Ahmad Mirza came in force, the Andijan Begs would
make me over to him and the country, but that if he took me to Auzkint and the
foothills thereabouts, I, at any rate, should not be made over and could go to
one of my mother's (half-) brothers, Sl. Mahmud Khan or Sl. Ahmad Khdn."
The
painting shows Babur mounted on a horse followed by his retainers going to
Akhsi. In the background is the fort of Andijan. The artist has depicted Babur
in a sorrowful mood. In the foreground are soldiers armed with muskets, and a
courtier on horse-back praying with his hands raised.
ACCLAMATION OF NINE STANDARDS
Artist, Jagnath
The
Mughals observed ceremonies and rules which were laid long ago by Chingiz Khan.
For each clan a place was fixed in battle-array. One of their ceremonies was acclamation
of nine standards which is thus described by Babur:
"The
standards were acclaimed in Mughal fashion. The Khan dismounted and nine
standards were set up in front of him. A Mughal tied a long strip of white
cloth to the thigh-bone of a cow and took the other end in his hand. Three
other long strips of white cloth were tied to the staves of three of the nine
standards, just below the yak-tails, and their other ends were brought for the
Khan to stand on one and for me and SI. Muh. Khanika to stand each one of the
two others. The Mughal who had hold of the strip of cloth fastened to the cow's
leg, then said something in Mughal while he looked at the standards and made
signs towards them. The Khan and those present sprinkled quiniz in the
direction of the standards; hautbois and drums were sounded towards them ; the
army flung the war-cry out three times towards them, mounted, cried it again
and rode at the gallop round them."
This
incident relates to 1502 A.D. and took place at Bish-lcint on the Khujand-Tashkent
road. Babur is standing on a strip of white cloth. In the foreground is an old
Mughal soldier holding a piece of cloth which he has tied to the leg of a cow.
In the background trumpets are being sounded and drums beaten.
KHUSRAU SHAH PAYING HOMAGE TO BABUR AT DOSHI NEAR KABUL
Khusrau
Shah, a Turkistani Qipchaq, was a noble of Mahrmad Mirth' who ruled the country
from Amu to the Hindukush mountains. Babur describes him as 'black-souled and
vicious, dunder-headed and senseless, disloyal, traitor, and a coward who had
not the pluck to stand up to a hen!' He met Babur at Dashi near Kabul. Babur
thus describes their meeting:
"Next
day, one in the middle of the First Rabi (end of August, 1504 A.D.), riding
light, I crossed the Andar-ãb water and took my seat under a large plane-tree
near Dashi, and thither came Khusrau Shah, in pomp and splendour, with a great
company of men. According to rule and custom, he dismounted some way off and
then made his approach. Three times he knelt. When we saw one another, three
times also on taking leave; he knelt once when asking after my welfare, once
again when he offered his tribute, and he did the same with Jahangir Mirza and
with Mirza Khan (Wais)."
Babur
is seated under a plane-tree and the person kneeling in front of him is Khusrau
Shah. In the foreground are his retainers including one holding a hawk. After
receiving homage from Khusrau Shah Babur marched to Kabul.
THE GARDEN OF FIDELITY NEAR KABUL (BAGH-I-WAFA)
Artist, Bhagwan
With
the capture of Kabul in 1504 begins the second phase in the career of Babur.
Kabul is known for its temperate fruits, viz, the grape, pomegranate, apricot,
apple, pear, peach, plum and walnut. In the hotter valleys, even sugarcane,
orange and citron were cultivated. Now that he had some peace, he indulged in
his favourite hobby of gardening. In 1508-9 he laid out a garden known as
Bagh-i-wafa near Fort Adinapur, which he thus describes:
"The
garden lies high, has running-water close at hand, and a mild winter climate.
In the middle of it, a one-mill stream flows constantly past the little hill on
which are the four garden-plots. In the south-west part of it there is a
reservoir, 10 by 10, round which are orange-trees and a few pomegranates, the
whole encircled by a trefoil-meadow. This is the best part of the garden, a
most beautiful sight when the oranges take colour. Truly that garden is
admir-ably situated !"
On the
top of the painting is Koh-i-Safed, the snow-covered mountain, and a persian
wheel for lifting water. Below is the Char-bagh divided into four plots in
which oranges are growing. A plantain and two cypresses grow in one of the
plots. A keord plant is in the plot on the top right. In the reservoir in the
centre a pair of ducks are gambolling. A solitary gardener is digging the soil
in the plot to the left.
Maur
thus records a visit to Kigh-i-wafd in A.D. 1519. "We dismounted in the
Bligh-i-wafd; its oranges had yellowed beautifully; its spring-bloom was
well-advanced, and it was very charming."
BABUR SUPERVISING THE CONSTRUCTION OF A RESERVOIR ON THE SPRING OF `KHWAJA SIH YARAN', NEAR KABUL
Artist, Prem
Babur
describes the pleasant villages around Kabul and their gardens. He records
thirty three different varieties of tulips on the foothills of Dasht-i-Shaikh.
In the ranges of Pamghan were a number of villages which grew grapes. Of these
he admired Istalif as the best of the lot.
"Few
villages match Istalif", wrote Babur, "with vineyards and fine
orchards on both sides of its great torrent, with waters needing no ice, cold
and, mostly, pure. Of its Great garden Aulugh Beg Mirza had taken forcible
possession; I took it over, after paying its price to the owners. There is a
pleasant halting-place outside it, under great planes, green, shady and
beautiful. A one-mill stream, having trees on both banks, flows constantly
through the middle of the garden; formerly its course was zig-zag and
irregular; I had it made straight and orderly; so the place became very
beautiful.
"I
ordered that the spring should be enclosed in mortared stone-work, 10 by 10,
and that a symmetrical, right-angles platform should be built on each of its
sides, so as to overlook the whole field of Judas trees. In, the world over,
there is a place to match this when the arghwans are in full bloom, I do not
know it. The yellow arghwiin grows plentifully there also, the red and the
yellow flowering at the same time.
"In
order to bring water to a large round seat which I had built on the hillside
and planted round with willows, I had a channel dug across the slope from a
half-mill stream, constantly flowing in a valley to the south-west of Sih-ydran.
The date of cutting this channel was found in jui-khush (kindly-channel)."
In this
colourful painting Babur holding a hawk is standing near the reservoir, which
he got constructed. In the background is his tent. On the top of the painting the artist has painted a dancing peacock, tail spread out into a gorgeous fan,
admired by a pair of pea-hens. Surely it is a reminder of India, the home of
the painter. On the rocks are a pair of mountain goats. In the foreground a
grey-hound is drinking water from the stream. It is undoubtedly one of the most
delightful paintings of the Babur.
BIRD CATCHING AT BARAN
Artist, Bhag
Babur Nama is in Kohistan province of Afghanistan. Babur wrote, "More beautiful in
Spring than any part even of Kabul are the openlands of Baran and the skirt of
Gul-i-bahar. Many sorts of tulips bloom there.
Kabul
in Spring is an Eden of verdure and blossom Matchless in Kabul the Spring of
Gul-i-bahar and Baran Few places are equal to these for spring excursions for
hawking or bird-shooting.
"Along
the Baran people take masses of cranes (tarnii) with the cord ; masses of
afiqdr, qargarii and qatan also. This method of bird catching is unique. They
twist a cord as long as the arrow's flight, tie the arrow at one end and a
bildfirgii at the other, and wind it up, from the arrow-end, on a piece of
wood, span-long and wrist-thick, right up to the bildfirgii. They then pull out
the piece of wood, leaving just the hole it was in. The bildfirgei being held
fast in the hand, the arrow is shot off towards the coming flock. If the cord
twist round a neck or wing, it brings the bird down. On the Baran everyone
takes birds in this way." By this device Baran people catch the many
herons from which they take the turban-aigrettes sent from Kabul for sale in
Khurasan.
"Of
bird-catchers there is also the band of slave-fowlers, two or three hundred
house-holds, whom some descendant of Timm-Beg made to migrate from near Multan
to the Baran. Bird-catching is their trade; they dig tanks, set decoy-birds on
them, put a net over the middle, and in this way take all sorts of birds."
This
painting by Bhag is one of the best studies of birds in the Babur Nama. Outside
the net set by the fowler who is hiding behind a screen are a pair of hoopoes,
sarus cranes, snipes and other water-birds. A sarus crane is innocently flying
into the net. In the foreground is a mountain stream with lotuses among whom
ducks are gambolling, providing a poetic touch to this painting.
BABUR FEASTING AT KOHAT
Artist, Daulat
"Whether
to cross the water of Sind, or where else to go, was discussed in that camp.
Baqi Chaghaniani represented that it seemed we might go, without crossing the
river and with one night's halt, to a place called Kohat where were many rich
tribesmen; moreover he brought Kabulis forward who represented the matter just
as he had done. We had never heard of the place, but, as he, my man in great
authority, saw it good to go to Kohat and had brought forward support of his
recommendation."
STAGE SET FOR A MEETING BETWEEN BABUR AND THE MIRZAS
This
painting relates to a meeting between Babur and the Mirzas of Khurdsdn on 26th
October, 1506, on the Murghab river. About the Mirzds, Babur comments, 'They
were good enough as company and in social matters, but they were strangers to
war, strategy, equipment, bold fight and encounter.' He thus describes this
meeting:
"Four
divans (tushuk) had been placed in the tent. Always in the Mirzd's tents one
side was like a gate-way and at the edge of this gate-way he always sat. A
divan was set there now on which he and Muzaffar Mirza sat together. Abu'l
muhsin Mirzd and I sat on another, set in the right-hand place of honour (tur).
On another, to Badiuz zamdn Mirza's left, sat Ibn-i-husain Mirza with Qasim SI.
Auzbeg, a son-in-law of the late Mirza and father of Qasim-i-husain Sultan. To
my right and below my divan was one on which sat Jahangir Mirza and
Abdu'r-razzaq Mirza. To the left of Qdsim SI. and Ibn-i-husain Mirld, but a
good deal lower, were Muh. Baranduq Beg, Zu'n-nun Beg and Qasim Beg.
Although
this was not a social gathering, cooked viands were brought in, drinks were set
with the food, and near them gold and silver cups."
BABUR ENJOYING A FEAST GIVEN BY THE MIRZAS AT HERAT
In 1507
Babur paid a visit to Herat. Here he saw the gardens, mosques and mausolea
including Gazur-gah, the tomb of Khwaja Abdullah Ansari. Here he married Masrima-Sultan
Begam. The Mirzds entertained Babur at a feast.
"Bad! Uzi-zaman Mirza asked me to a party arranged in the Maqauwi-khana of the
world-adorning Garden. He asked also some of my close circle, and some of our
braves.
"At
this party they set a roast goose before me but as I was no carver or
disjointer of birds, I left it alone. 'Do you not like it?' inquired the Mirza.
Said I, 'am a poor carver.' On this he at once disjointed the bird and set it
again before me. In such matters he had no match. At the end of the party he
gave me an enamelled waist-dagger, a char-qab, and a tipu-chaqt."
This is
a beautiful painting showing a feast in a garden, under the shade of a chenart.
Cooks are busy cooking in the foreground and attendants are carrying food.
Babur is making a futile attempt to carve a goose, while Badi-u'z-zaman Mirza
is looking on and is about to intervene.
BABUR CAPTURES A FLOCK OF SHEEP FROM THE HAZARAS
After
seeing the sights of Herat, Babur left for Kabul. Instead of travelling by the
Kandahar road which though longer, was safe and easy, he took the mountain-road
which was difficult and dangerous. During the night there was heavy snow-fall
and a blizzard. He took shelter in a cave along with his men. Next morning
while he was on the move a body of Turkman Hazards attacked his army with
arrows.
"I
myself collected a few of the Hazards' sheep, gave them into Yarak Taghai's
charge, and went to the front. By ridge and valley, driving horses and sheep
before us, we went to Timur Beg's Langar and there dismounted. Fourteen or
fifteen Hazard theives had fallen into our hands; I had thought of having them
put to death when we next dismounted, with various torture, as a warning to all
high-waymen and robbers, but Qdsim Beg came across them on the road and, with
mistimed compassion, set them free."
In this
painting we see Babur on horse-back and in front of him is a flock of sheep
captured from the Hazards.
BABUR AND COMPANIONS WARMING THEMSELVES BEFORE A CAMP FIRE
While
Babur was raiding the Turkman Hazards, news came that his nobles in Kabul had
mutinied and had declared Miria Khan as Padshdh. They also spread a rumour that
the Mirzas of Herat had captured Babur and imprisoned him in a fort. On the way
to Kabul he encountered intense cold. As he describes:
"We
sent on Ahmad the messenger (yasilwal) and Qara Ahmad Yuninchi to say to the
Begs, 'Here we are at the time promised; be ready! behold!' After crossing
Minar-hill and dismounting on its skirt, helpless with cold, we lit fires to
warm ourselves. It was not time to light the signal-fire; we just lit these
because we were helpless in that mighty cold." Next morning he reached
Kabul and subdued the rebels.
This
painting of a night scene shows Babur's qualities of leadership; his concern
for his men and comradely treatment he gave them in times of adversity.
BATTLE SCENE NEAR MURGHAN KOH
Artist, Makra
Shaibaq
Khan, Uzbek captured Herat in June 1507. The Mirzas supplicated Babur for help.
Babur pushed on towards Kandahar. The Uzbeks were led by Shah Beg and his
younger brother Muqim. This painting shows a battle near Kandahar. Babur
states:
"We
mean time, after putting our adversary to flight, had crossed those same
channels towards the naze of Murghan-koh (Birds'-h ill). Someone on a grey
horse was going backwards and forwards irresolutely along the hill-skirt, while
we were getting across; I likened him to Shah Beg; seemingly it was he.
"Our
men having beaten their opponents, all went off to pursue and unhorse them.
Remained with me eleven to count, `Abdu'l-lah the librarian being one. Muqim
was still keeping his ground and fighting. Without a glance at the fewness of
our men, we had the nagarets sounded and, putting our trust in God, moved with
face set for Muqim." After this incident Babur moved on to Kandahar, and
looted the treasury.
It is
an excellent painting which conveys the excitement of a battle. It is packed
with action, and is symbolic of the restless energy of Babur. Babur holding a
naked sword is charging the enemy. Facing him is Muqim holding a shield. Drums
are being lustily beaten by the drummers of both sides.
BABUR CROSSING A RIVER SEATED ON A RAFT
In May
1508 Babur abandoned the invasion of Hindustan. He visited Lamghanat which
borders the land inhabited by Kafirs, who had resisted conversion to Islam.
Here he crossed a river seated on a raft for the first time. Thus states BAbur:
"As
it was not found desirable to go on into Hindustan, I sent Mulla Baba of
Pashaghar back to Kabul with a few braves. Mean time I marched from near
MandrAwar to Mar and Shiwa and lay there for a few days. From Atar I visited
Kanar and Nurgal; from Kfinar I went back to camp on a raft; it was the first
time I had sat on one; it pleased me much, and the raft came into common use
thereafter."
The
naked swimmers are pushing the raft with all their might. On the raft Babur is
calmly seated surrounded by his body-guards.
On 6th
March, 1506, Babur's first son Htunayun was born in the citadel of Kabul. A
feast was arranged in the Chdr-Bagh. All the Begs brought presents, and dancers
entertained the party.
DEER HUNTING IN 'ALI-SHANG AND ALANGAR MOUNTAINS
Artist, Tulsi
This
painting by Tulsi, who specializes in drawing animals, depicts a hunting scene
in Afghanistan. Apart from deer of different varieties, rabbits, foxes and wild
sheep are also depicted. On a rock a chakor is perching. Babur describes this
event as follows:
"On
Saturday (29th) we hunted the hill between 'Ali-shang and Alangair. One
hunting-circle having been made on the 'Ali-shang side, another on the Alangar,
the deer were driven down off the hill and many were killed. Returning from hunting,
we dismounted in a garden belonging to the Maliks of Alangar and there had a
party."
'Ali-shang
and Alangar are mountainous districts of Afghanistan bordering the Hindu-kush,
inhabited by Kafirs who retained their old religion and did not embrace Islam.
Babur describes that trees cover the banks of the streams of 'Ali-Shang and
Alangdr below the fort. The fort shown in the painting is probably the same. He
also mentions that the valley grows grapes, green and red, all trained on
trees.
As a
study of fauna of Afghanistan, this painting has considerable value. It also
conveys the excitement of a hunt most vividly.
BABUR HUNTING RHINOCEROS NEAR BIGRAM (PESHAWAR)
This
painting describes a hunting scene dated 10th December, 1526 near Bigram
(Pesha-war). Babur crossed the river Siyalh-fib, and formed a hunting circle
down-stream. He records.
"After
a little, a person brought word that there was a rhino in a bit of jungle near
Bigram, and that people had been stationed near-about it. We betook ourselves,
loose rein, to the place, formed a ring round the jungle, made a noise, and
brought the rhino out, when it took its way across the plain. Humdyun and those
come with him from that side (Tramoun-tana), who had never seen one before,
were much entertained. It was pursued for two miles; many arrows were shot at
it; it was brought down without having made a good set at manor horse. Two
others were killed. I had often wondered how a rhino and an elephant would
be-have if brought face to face; this time one came out right in front of some
elephants the mahauts were bringing along, it did not face them when the
mahauts drove them towards it, but got off in another direction."
In the
sixteenth century rhinos were found as far north as Peshawar and Sind. Now they
are no longer to be seen in these areas. At present rhinos are preserved in the
game sanctuaries of Assam and northern Bengal.
THE BATTLE OF PANIPAT
Babur
invaded India for the fifth time in 1525. He defeated Daulat Khan Lodi and
occupied Punjab. He marched through Jaswan dun, Rapar, Banur, Arnbala,
Shahabad, and reached Panipat on 12th April, 1525. He collected seven hundred
carts, which were joined togehter with ropes of raw hide. Between every two
carts mantelets were fixed, behind which matchlockmen were posted. Opposing him
was Ibrahim Lodi's army of 1,00,000 men and one thousand elephants. Mustafa,
his commander of artillery made excellent use of his guns.
Babur records,
"Mustafa
the commissary for his part made excellent discharge of zarb-zan shots from the
left hand of the centre. Our right, left, centre and turning-parties having
surrounded the enemy rained arrows down on him and fought ungrudgingly. He made
one or two small charges on our right and left but under our men's arrows, fell
back on his own centre. His right and left hands (qui) were massed in such a
crowd that they could neither move forward against us nor force a way for
flight.
"When
the incitement to battle had come, the Sun was spear-high; till mid-day
fighting had been in full force; noon passed, the foe was crushed in defeat,
our friends rejoicing and gay. By God's mercy and kindness, this difficult
affair was made easy for us!"
Ibrahim
lay dead among thirty thousand of his soldiers, and Babur emerged the winner.
The
painting shows the battle-scene. Between the guns, soldiers armed with bows and
arrows are making sallies. It is surprising that hills are shown in the background.
The battle-field of Panipat is a flat plain. Drummers are beating drums to
infuse courage among the attackers. On the top of the painting is shown the
town of Panipat
SQUIRRELS, A PEACOCK AND A PEA-HEN, SARUS CRANES AND FISHES
Artist, Bhawani
Babur
appropriately starts his account of the birds of India with the peacock, the
national bird of India.
"The
peacock (Ar. Taus) is a beautifully coloured and splendid bird. Its form
(andam) is not equal to its colouring and beauty. Its body may be as large as
the crane's (tüawa) but it is not so tall. On the head of both cock and hen are
20 or 30 feathers rising some 2 or 3 inches high. The hen has neither colour
nor beauty. The head of the cock has an iridescent collar (tauq sfisani); its
neck is of a beautiful blue; below the neck, its back is painted in yellow,
parrot-green, blue and violet colours. The flowers on its back are much the
smaller; below the back as far as the tail-tips are larger flowers painted in
the same colours. The tail of some peacocks grows to the length of a man's
extended arms. It has a small red tail, under its flowered feathers, like the
tail of other birds. Its flight is feebler than the pheasants; it cannot do
more than one or two short flights. Hindustani call the peacock mor."
This
painting is by Bhawani, who excels in painting birds and animals. On the top
squirrels are playing on a tree. In the middle, a peacock and a pea-hen are
shown, below a pair of sarus cranes, and in the pond a pair of fishes. It is
one of the best paintings of birds and animals in this Babur Nama.
BABUR CROSSING THE RIVER SON OVER A BRIDGE OF BOATS
Artist, Jagnath
This
painting depicts an incident which took place on 14th April, 1529 when Babur
marched through Bihar and crossed the river Son by a bridge of boats. He had
given names to the prominent boats; a large one built in Agra was named Araish
(Repose). Another presented by Araish Khan was named Araish (Ornament).
Another large-sized one was named Gunjaish (Capacious). In it he had another
platform set up, on the top of the one already in it. To a little skiff was
given the name of Farmaish (Commissioned). Babur thus narrates this incident:
"I
left that ground by boat on Thursday. I had already ordered the boats to wait,
and on getting up with them, I had them fastened together abreast in line.
Though all were not collected there, those there were greatly exceeded the
breadth of the river. They could not move on, however, so-arranged, because the
water was here shallow, there deep, here swift, there still. A crocodile (gharial)
shewing itself, a terrified fish leaped so high as to fall into a boat; it was
caught and brought to me."
Babur
is sitting on the platform of the Gunjaish, surrounded by attendants. In the
fore-ground is a boat into which, a fish has leapt. Two soldiers armed with
muskets are firing at the crocodile. All the on-lookers are sharing the
excitement which the incident has provided.
Writer – M.S. Randhawa
Unlike the widely scattered
courts of Rajasthan, the numerous minor Rajput kingdoms of the Himalayan
foothills were clustered in an area only three hundred miles long by a hundred
wide. Although they shared a similar cultural background to the southern Rajput
courts, they were effectively separated from them by the broad expanse of the
Punjab plains, and they were also less affected by Mughal incursions. This
comparative isolation, together with the closer communications between the Hill
courts, contributed to the development of some of the most expressive styles of
Indian painting, characterised in their earlier phases by a controlled
vehemence of colour and line, and later by a mellifluous idiom that combined
Mughal technique with Rajput devotional and romantic sensibility.
The origins of the first
classic style of Pahari (Hill) painting, associated with the court of Basohli,
are still not understood, though it may have had antecedents in the widespread
pre-Mughal style as well as in local Hill idioms. An early illustration to the
Rasamanjari, a poetical text classifying lovers and their behaviour, reveals a
fully formed and highly charged style, with a taut line and vibrant palette.
The interpretation of literary conceits is as direct as in Rajasthani
manuscripts.
A lady who has been secretly unfaithful explains to her confidante that the love-marks on her breast were in fact scratches caused by the household cat as it chased a rat during the night. The cat and the rat appear on the pavilion roofer here is nothing here of the hybrid weakness sometimes found in Rajasthani work affected by Popular Mughal fluence. So confident was the Pahari artists' vision that Mugha portraiture could be reinterpreted with equal intensity. The Mankot raja with a rosary, huqqa and sword is not a psychological study of an individual but a celebration of the proud Rajput type silhouetted against a hot yellow background, orange bolster and white floorsprcad. Painting at the court of Kulu had a particular wildness and zest, Kuutala raga, from an extended ragamala series of the Pahari type, is depicted as a prince feeding pigeons; Akbar himself had been fond of the sport of pigeon-flying, which was known as ishq-bazi or love-play'.
A lady who has been secretly unfaithful explains to her confidante that the love-marks on her breast were in fact scratches caused by the household cat as it chased a rat during the night. The cat and the rat appear on the pavilion roofer here is nothing here of the hybrid weakness sometimes found in Rajasthani work affected by Popular Mughal fluence. So confident was the Pahari artists' vision that Mugha portraiture could be reinterpreted with equal intensity. The Mankot raja with a rosary, huqqa and sword is not a psychological study of an individual but a celebration of the proud Rajput type silhouetted against a hot yellow background, orange bolster and white floorsprcad. Painting at the court of Kulu had a particular wildness and zest, Kuutala raga, from an extended ragamala series of the Pahari type, is depicted as a prince feeding pigeons; Akbar himself had been fond of the sport of pigeon-flying, which was known as ishq-bazi or love-play'.
Although there is some evidence
of strongly Mughal-influenced work in the Hills in the late 17th century,
comparable to that of the Bikaner school, this was exceptional during the first
phase of Pahari painting. But in the second quarter of the 18th century
a fundamental change of direction took place. Artists trained in the Mughal
style began to arrive in increasing numbers, particularly after the sack of
Delhi in 1739. From being the vehicle of a jaded sensuality, their technique
became revitalised in lyrical depictions of Hindu poetical and devotional
subjects, in a development paralleled in Rajasthan by the less subtle
Kishangarh style.
Members of the family of the
artist Pandit Seu, who were based at Guler but travelled widely among the Hill
courts, were influential in shaping and disseminating the new style. One of
Seu's sons was the great portrait artist Nainsukh, who had probably received
some Mughal training. He enjoyed an unusually intimate and understanding
relationship with his patronkthe minor prince Balwant Singh, whom he portrayed
carrying out all the daily activities of a nobleman: hunting, listening to
music, inspecting a horse, or simply writing a letter or preparing to go to
bed. Compared with the stark Mankot picture, Nainsukh's portraiture and spatial
setting are far more naturalistic. Nevertheless the bold, geometrical
arrangement of the architecture and back-ground areas remains typically Rajput.
A religious subject in the
early Guler style combines the new technical refinement with a devotional feeling
taking the form of tender domestic observation Shiva is shown sewing a garment,
while Parvati strings human heads for his necklace. Their sons, the many-headed
Karttikcya and the elephant-headed Ganesha, who plays with Shiva's cobra, sit
beside them, and their respective vehicles, the bull, lion, peacock and rat,
wait in attendance Wersions of the graceful Guler idiom were developed at
several courts, such as Garhwal to the south-east, where a Barahmasa
illustration of the winter month of Aghan was painted a pair of lovers, idealised
as Radha and Krishna, gaze at one another on a terrace while two cranes fly
skywards.
The last great Pahari patron
was Raja Sansar Chand of Kangra (1775-1823), whose long reign saw both the
final maturity of Hill painting and the beginning of its decline. Early in his
reign several masterly series of the classic texts celebrating the life of
Krishna were illustrated for him. The love of Radha and Krishna was depicted
with tender directness in idyllic landscape setting. As in earlier periods of
Indian painting, the luxuriant burgeoning of nature serves to enhance and
express the emotions of the human figures. (Krishna is as usual shown as an
elegant, princely figure; perhaps akin to the young Sansar Chand. As at Guler, scenes
of zenana life were also charmingly rendered, with increasingly curvilinear
rhythms, as in a scene of ladies throwing powder and squirting water at the
spring festival of Holi. But, as at Kishangarh, such a sweetly refined style
could only remain fresh for a short time.
From the beginning of the 19th century it became facile and sentimental. At the same time, Sansar Chand's power was lost first to Gurkha invaders and then to the Sikhs, who had won control of the Punjab plains and now began to annexe the Hill kingdoms. However, the British traveller William Moorcroft, who visited Sansar Chand in 1820, reports that, though living in reduced circumstances, he was still 'fond of drawing' and continued to support several artists as well as a zenana of three hundred ladies. His daily life was still passed in an orderly round of prayer, conversation, chess, viewing pictures and performances of music and dance.
From the beginning of the 19th century it became facile and sentimental. At the same time, Sansar Chand's power was lost first to Gurkha invaders and then to the Sikhs, who had won control of the Punjab plains and now began to annexe the Hill kingdoms. However, the British traveller William Moorcroft, who visited Sansar Chand in 1820, reports that, though living in reduced circumstances, he was still 'fond of drawing' and continued to support several artists as well as a zenana of three hundred ladies. His daily life was still passed in an orderly round of prayer, conversation, chess, viewing pictures and performances of music and dance.
The Sikhs continued to hold the
Punjab until their displacement by the British in 1849. They commissioned
portraits of their Gurus and themselves in a weakened Pahari manner, to which
they brought little inspiration as patrons. However one of the most imposing of
all Indian portraits is that of Maharaja Gulab Singh. His large figure which
fills the picture area is shown seated holding the familiar props of a sprig of
flowers and a sword. He wears a dextrously composed turban and coat with
sharply ruffled hem, and his face, no longer in profile, stares obliquely away
from the viewer in baleful self-possession.
Writer
– Andrew T0psfield