Showing posts with label Life of Van Eyck. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Life of Van Eyck. Show all posts
The
works of Jan van Eyck are celebrated for their visual splendour and precision
of detail. Their brilliant colours and magnificent definition are due to Jan's
refinement of the oil-painting technique.
Jan van
Eyck was highly praised in his own time, and is traditionally renowned as the
founder of the Netherlandish school of painting. His fame rests largely on the
illusion of reality he created in his paintings and his delight in naturalistic
detail and rich, decorative effects.
Little
is known of Van Eyck's early career, and the paintings which survive are those
of a mature artist, well-practiced in his craft. Most of Van Eyck's work for
Philip of Burgundy was of a decorative and temporary nature, and has long since
disappeared. His surviving works were painted for rich and aristocratic
patrons, men moving in court circles. For them Van Eyck created majestic
Madonnas, rather than the more homely women of his contemporary, Robert Campin,
who worked for bourgeois patrons. Even when placing the Virgin and Child in a
domestic setting, then popular, Van Eyck elevated his Madonna on a throne-like
chair, with a brocaded canopy overhead and rich carpet underfoot. Elsewhere in
The Ghent Altarpiece and The Madonna with Canon van der Paele he depicted the
material splendour of bejewelled robes and crowns to speak of the richness of
heaven.
This
was a period of growing demand for life-like portraits, and a time when faith
was direct and called for clear and 'real' images of religious doctrine. Van
Eyck responded by exploiting his acute powers of observation and his formidable
technique to produce unique illusions of reality. Whilst Van Eyck observed the
world around him, he never attempted to reproduce it with topographical
accuracy. Instead, he used his knowledge to create imaginative landscapes,
townscapes and interiors that would appear familiar to his patrons. The
background to The Madonna with Chancellor Rolin has the feel of the River
Meuse, but the town cannot be identified.
By the
1430s, Van Eyck broke with tradition and refined a new plateau-type
composition, where the foreground figures appear to be higher in the imagined
space than those in the background. This enabled him to develop his interest in
landscapes with far-reaching vistas. He also began to explore the relationship
between interior and exterior, looking through a window or over a parapet, and
was perhaps the first painter to present the back view of figures gazing into
the landscape, in The Madonna with Chancellor Rolin.
The
exact, scientific perspective developed in Florence was unknown in Flanders,
but Van Eyck explored an empirical method of perspective to paint his
interiors. By the time of the compelling Arnolfini Wedding, he was perfectly
able to create the novel effect of a real space opening forward, which seemed
to continue beyond the frame and include the viewer.
Symbolism
is an important element in Van Eyck's religious and secular works. In The
Arnolfini Wedding he was concerned to include numerous symbols of faith,
without disrupting the overall natural effect. The symbols appear at first
sight to be everyday objects, but Van Eyck probably chose them for their
traditional symbolism: a lighted candle in a chandelier indicating the presence
of God, a griffon terrier, fidelity, a carafe of water, the purity of the
Virgin, and a beam of light through a window, the Incarnation.
Vasari
and other early biographers credited Van Eyck with the invention of oil
painting. In fact it had been known for many years but was used in a limited
way. However, in Van Eyck's time, improved varnishes, diluents and driers were
distilled, and Jan explored the possibilities of their use with an
unprecedented sophistication. He painted on the usual wooden panel covered with
a smooth layer of gesso (plaster), then, and after beginning his work with
opaque paint, he would apply many thin layers of translucent, oil-based colour
glazes to achieve the glowing and luminous effects characteristic of his work.
It was
Van Eyck's technical expertise that enabled him to reproduce the visual world
convincingly. His figures are enhanced by natural lighting and on occasion he
even created the illusion of a foot or angel's wing projecting forward out of
the picture. He also delighted in the precise rendering of texture.
Van
Eyck's contribution to portraiture was also significant. He abandoned the
Gothic tradition of exaggerated physical features in favour of a life-like
description of the individual face. He realized that the three-quarter view,
with head turned halfway between profile and full-face, could be much more
naturalistic than the conventional profile. He understood that if the face was
turned towards the light, he could use the shadow playing over the visible side
to describe minute details of the surface. With his usual ingenuity, he
explored ways to include the hands to greatest effect, and experimented with
the impact of a novel device a direct glance out of the picture.
Van
Eyck also appears to have given considerable thought to the inclusion of
appropriate inscriptions in many of his works. These were often incorporated
into the painting itself, or worked into the picture frame. The motto 'As Best
I Can' appears several times, reflecting a pride in his work and a becoming
humility.
Writer
– Marshall Cavendish
The Port of Bruges
Now a
town of quiet tree-lined canals and fine medieval architecture, Bruges once led
a very different life it was the trading centre of the whole of north-west
Europe.
On a
January day in 1430, the Flemish city of Bruges was on its best behaviour.
Thousands of its citizens lined the narrow streets, jostling and straining to
catch a glimpse of the Princess Isabella of Portugal as she passed by. She had
arrived from her homeland to be with her future husband, Duke Philip the Good
of Burgundy.
Among
the Duke's enormous entourage that day was no less than 40 varlets de chamber.
One of them was Jan van Eyck. For the last part of his life, Van Eyck was based
in Bruges, a port on the Zwijn River, almost 10 miles inland from the North Sea.
His works helped to characterize the city as the cradle of Flemish painting.
But Bruges had already won an enviable reputation as a major centre of the
medieval cloth industry, and as the main international emporium of north-west
Europe.
As one
French chronicler noted, when describing that royal entry of 1430, Bruges was
'thronged with visitors from foreign lands . . . a centre for merchandise and a
meeting-place for those of other lands, where pass greater quantities of goods
than, perchance, in any other city of Europe'. The chronicler added, 'and a
great shame it would be if ever Bruges were destroyed. .
In
subsequent centuries Bruges declined, but it never was destroyed. Thus the city
of Van Eyck's era has not completely disappeared from view. Many of the homes
of the medieval bourgeoisie are still standing tall, thin houses, mostly built
of brick, subtly decorated with pink or grey sandstone, white stone from
Brabant or blue Tournai limestone. Their large rooms are lit by spacious
windows, which once allowed the householder's prized oil paintings to be seen
to their best advantage. The old Market Hall can still be identified from afar
by its distinctive belfry. The Town Hall, the Church of Notre Dame and the
Beguinage a retreat for secular nuns all survives to recall the city's former
prosperity.
EARLY TURMOIL
Yet
this tangible legacy can easily mislead. The quiet canals and the dignified
Gothic architecture create an atmosphere of tranquillity, even of serenity. But
this belies the turmoil of the city's early history, when its citizens fiercely
resisted the efforts of Flemish counts and French kings to subdue them; in
their halcyon days the Three Members from Flanders' Bruges, Ghent and Ypres
virtually governed the province between them. Bruges was no quaint medieval
backwater. It was a tumultuous commercial city, where merchants from 17 nations
operated, and 20 states were represented by official ministers.
In
medieval times, the continent comprised two main commercial zones that of the
Baltic and the North Sea, and that of the Mediterranean. Bruges began to
prosper as a textile centre within the northern zone, and also as a convenient
port for the commercial traffic between England and Flanders. As the Flemish
cloth industry came to rely more and more heavily on English supplies of wool,
so the trade of Bruges expanded rapidly.
TRADE GROWS
The
port then evolved into something far more than a simple Anglo-Flemish trade
junction. Germans, Normans, Bretons and Spaniards came in increasing numbers to
buy and sell at Bruges's annual fair, established in 1200. Before the end of
the 13th century, the great galleys of Genoa and Venice were heading regularly
for the northern port. So at a time when land communications were unreliable,
Bruges became the destination of seaborne merchants from both the northern and
southern commercial centres of Europe.
The
native Flemings did not themselves develop as international merchants. Instead,
the foreign community of Bruges grew larger and it became a truly cosmopolitan
city. Its prosperity came to rely not on intermittent fairs, but on permanent
trade. Merchandise was sent there for distribution in all directions and the
commodities which found their way on to the quayside came from around the
world. There were Russian furs, northern cloths, wines from Burgundy, Bordeaux
and the Rhine, and metals from Germany. There was wool, tin and cheeses from
England, butter and pigs from Denmark, corn from Prussia, and salt fish and
dried fish from Norway. And there was Baltic timber in abundance, and fruit
from Spain. Perhaps the most exotic goods were those stocked in the warehouses
of the spice-importers, cinnamon from Ceylon, cloves from the Molucca Islands,
mace from Arabia not forgetting the saffron, cinnabar, ivory and oil of white
poppy which were used as artists' materials.
FINANCE THRIVES
Such a
thriving commercial centre naturally attracted businessmen. By 1369 there were
15 separate 'merchant banks' there. Italian bankers and money-lenders were keen
to establish their northern branches in the city. In 1469, the Medici of
Florence had a staff of eight at Bruges, one of whom was responsible for
purchases of cloth and wool, while another had the duty of selling silks and
velvets to the Burgundian court. Giovanni Arnolfini, whose wedding portrait was
painted by Van Eyck, was himself an Italian expatriate from Lucca. He was one
of the leading importers of alum, a substance essential for the dyeing of wool.
Germans
as well as Italians found the city to be a profitable home-from-home. Bruges
was one of the Hanseatic League's overseas trading posts, along with London,
Bergen and Novgorod. The League had been formed by German merchants to give
political backing to their trading agreements. The trading posts, or kontore,
were independent from their host country. Within them, members were under the
jurisdiction of German law; houses, offices and warehouses were all corporately
owned and here the League members lived and traded.
Communities
of foreign merchants at this time, were often encouraged to live in a
particular area of a city, separate from the native citizens. In Bruges,
however, the Hanseatic League were not confined to specific quarters of the
city but lived among the Flemings. Elsewhere in northern Europe, these
privileged German League communities often encountered native resentment, but
their kontore was welcomed in Bruges and seen as a source of extra trade and
revenue, increasing the city's prosperity.
A large
proportion of the citizens, however, did not share in the general affluence.
They had to endure the rigours and squalor of medieval urban life as best they
could. 'This is no place for poor people', wrote Tafur of Seville, a
scandalized visitor, in 1435. He also commented with disapproval on the
bourgeoisie, with their 'baths for men and women in common, a practice which
they look on as normal and decent as we do going to Mass. There is no doubt he
went on, 'that there is considerable licence . . .' He probably noticed local
zeal for alcohol too in 1420 the annual consumption of wine per head of the
population was 100 litres.
There
were certainly plenty of opportunities to over-indulge on occasions such as the
24 great tournaments held at Bruges between 1405 and 1482 for example. Those
well-heeled burghers, who liked to have themselves depicted in attitudes of
pious austerity, also revelled in their conspicuous consumption. Bruges in the
mid 15th century was, however, a city that had already started to decline. The
river Zwijn began to silt up during the 14th century. By 1490 it was completely
blocked and Bruges then ceased to be an important port commercially, although
it flourished artistically under the Dukes of Burgundy.
By
1500, Antwerp had taken over the commercial mantle and some people began to
talk of 'Bruges le mort' (Bruges the dead). But it could almost be said that
its great painters at this time had already conferred a kind of immortality on
the city.
Writer
– Marshall Cavendish
1429
While
Van Eyck was fulfilling a delicate commission to paint a likeness of the
Portuguese princess Isabella, so that Philip of Burgundy could decide whether
or not to marry her, a young French girl was embarking on a military career
which would tip the balance of power between France and England.
As the New
Year, 1429, dawned, France was in a turmoil. The French crown was claimed for
the English boy king, Henry VI; and the claim seemed likely to be made good.
Leaving their Burgundian allies to guard the north-east, the English were
pressing south and had besieged the important town of Orleans. The French had
become demoralized by a string of English victories, and the dauphin, Charles
(last Charles VII), was still uncrowned; his legitimacy was in doubt and he was
only recognized as king south of the Loire. But the next few months were to see
one of the most remarkable phenomena of the late Middle Ages, the brief but
spectacular career of Joan of Arc, whose convictions changed history.
In
January, 1429, Joan was 17 years old, a simple farmer's daughter from the
village of Domremy in Lorraine. But from the age of 13 she had seen visions and
heard voices she identified as the Archangel Michael and Saints Catherine and
Margaret. Her voices told her that it was her mission to lead France to victory
and see Charles crowned at Reims.
HEROINE DRESSED AS A BOY
The
previous summer, in 1428, she had tried to persuade the local French captain at
Vaucouleurs, 12 miles away, to help her in her mission. The captain did little,
and when the news of the siege of Orleans came through, she dressed in men's
clothes, had her hair cut short and, in January, 1429, set off to find the
dauphin herself. Early in March, she presented herself at the Chateau of
Chinon, where she proved immediately that she was either heaven-sent or
extremely intelligent. For Charles had told one of his courtiers to take his
place on the throne before Joan entered the room, but she had no trouble in
picking out the true king at first sight which may or may not have had
something to do with his notoriously unprepossessing appearance. At any rate,
Charles was won over, and after a thorough investigation into her religious
credentials, Joan was given a suit of white armour, a black charger and her own
banner and pennon, and sent to Tours to join the army. Joan is said to have
supplied her own sword, miraculously indicating the spot where one lay buried
behind an altar.
Whether
inspired or simply fanatical, Joan had immense charisma and even greater courage.
Where she led, the soldiers of France would follow. She was absolutely
convinced that God was on the side of France. The three letters she dictated
and sent to her enemies reflect her confidence 'You Englishmen, who have no
right in the kingdom of France the King of Heaven commands you by me, Joan the
Maid, to leave your strong-holds and return to your own country!'. By May, the
French had driven the English besiegers from Orleans and, as the French overran
the English bastilles, it was Joan who planted the first scaling ladder. A
series of brilliant victories followed. With the enemy badly shaken, Joan
spurred on the dilatory Charles to enter Reims, and in July he was finally
crowned in the Cathedral with 'the Maid of Orleans' standing by his side.
By the
end of the year, Joan's run of success began to falter and in the autumn she
was wounded in the thigh with an arrow though her fellow soldiers had to drag
her by force from the battlefield. But she remained an enormous inspiration to
the French and when the English captured her the following year they tried
desperately to have her discredited with a show trial, before allowing her to
be burned at the stake as a dangerous and influential heretic.
ENGLAND'S LOSSES
The
English dislike of Joan was understandable. At the beginning of 1429, they were
poised to overrun all France. By December, they had been pushed back into the
region round Paris and the alliance with Burgundy was less sound than it had
been before the maid intervened.
Writer
– Marshall Cavendish
All of Jan van Eyck’s
dated paintings are from the last decade of his life, when he was complete
master of the new oil-painting technique. Subsequent painters have developed
other aspects of the rich potential of oil, but no-one has ever surpassed Jan's
skill in the minute rendition of texture or the creation of glowing effects of
colour. The Ghent Altarpiece, with its countless figures, its beautiful
landscape and townscape backgrounds, and its exquisite still-life details, is
like I a manifesto of the possibilities of oil paint.
Van Eyck’s other
paintings are either religious paintings or’ portraits. Sometimes he combined
the two, as in The Madonna with Chancellor Rolin and The Madonna with Canon van
der Paele, and his most famous portrait The Amolfini Wedding has religious P
overtones in its symbolic references to the sanctity of marriage. His
individual portraits, such as Cardinal Albergati and Baudouin de Lannoy, show
his matchless ability to combine unrelenting physical scrutiny with a feeling
for the sitter’ s inner life.
This portrait has an inscription in Greek
characters reading Timotheos’, the name of a famous musician of antiquity. This
has led to speculation that the sitter was a musician, perhaps Gilles Binchois, one of
the leading Flemish composers of the period and like Jan van Eyck a member of Philip the Good’s court.
Giovanni Amolfini was a merchant from Lucca in Italy who settled in Bruges in 1420. His wife, Giovanna Cenami, was also from Lucca. This painting was almost certainly commissioned as a document of their wedding; varioussymbolic details (such as the dog, representing fidelity) attest to this, and it has an appropriate solemn dignity.
Nicolas Rolin, who is shown praying in front of
the Virgin and Child, was Chancellor of Burgundy and Brabant. The three arches
are probably intended to symbolize the Trinity (Father, Son and Holy Ghost); through them is seen a breathtaking landscape that shows Van Eyck's mastery of space and atmosphere.
These two panels, painted in grisaille (shades
of grey) may originally have been the outer wings of an altarpiece, but it is
possible that they always formed a diptych (a pair of pictures hinged down the middle). They are
remarkable pieces of illusionistic skill; the figures, which are like miniature
statues, appear to stand in front of the frames (painted, not real) and they cast delicately observed reflections on the polished background.
This painting is also known as the Lucca
Madonna, as it was once owned by the Duke of Lucca. It is one of Van Eyck‘s
most tender and intimate works, but it also has great dignity. As with so many of Van Eyck’s
paintings, the beautifully observed details can often be symbolically
interpreted; the four lions on the Virgin's splendid canopied throne, for example, make reference to those on
the throne of Solomon, wlzere they symbolized royal power.
Writer - Marshall Cavendish